Matter of Kwesi P.

2019 NY Slip Op 8359
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 2019
Docket10363
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 8359 (Matter of Kwesi P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Kwesi P., 2019 NY Slip Op 8359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Matter of Kwesi P. (2019 NY Slip Op 08359)
Matter of Kwesi P.
2019 NY Slip Op 08359
Decided on November 19, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 19, 2019
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

10363

[*1] In re Kwesi P., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency


Law Office of Cabelly & Calderon, Jamaica (Lewis S. Calderon of counsel), for appellant.

Georgia M. Pestana, Acting Corporation Couunsel, New York (Deborah E. Wassel of counsel), for presentment agency.



Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Adetokunbo O. Fasanya, J.), entered on or about June 19, 2018, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute criminal facilitation in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for a new fact-finding hearing on both petitions covered by the disposition.

As the presentment agency concedes, appellant's admission was defective because the court's allocution of appellant's mother failed to advise her of the rights appellant was waiving as a result of his admission and the dispositional consequences of appellant's admission (see Family Ct Act § 321.3[1]). However, because appellant violated his probation, which was extended and remains in effect, we agree with the presentment agency that the petition should not be dismissed, and that the matter should be remanded for a new fact-finding determination on both petitions covered by the disposition (see Matter of Joseph P. , 229 AD2d 318, 318 [1st Dept 1996]).

We find it unnecessary to reach any other issues.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 19, 2019

DEPUTY CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Joseph P.
229 A.D.2d 318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 8359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-kwesi-p-nyappdiv-2019.