Matter of Kwame M. v. Jennifer A.

123 A.D.3d 1128, 997 N.Y.S.2d 637
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 2014
Docket2013-05394
StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.3d 1128 (Matter of Kwame M. v. Jennifer A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Kwame M. v. Jennifer A., 123 A.D.3d 1128, 997 N.Y.S.2d 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Margaret P. McGowan, J.), dated May 1, 2013. The order dismissed, without a hearing, the putative father’s petition for an order of filiation.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The putative father commenced this proceeding, requesting that genetic testing be performed to determine whether he was the biological father of the subject child. Over objection by the putative father and the mother, the Family Court dismissed the putative father’s petition without a hearing. The mother appeals.

Following the dismissal of the putative father’s petition, the mother’s parental rights were terminated in a related termination proceeding, and we are affirming the order of fact-finding and disposition entered in that proceeding (see Matter of Davina R.M.R.L. [Jennifer A.], 123 AD3d 1126 [2014] [decided herewith]). The termination of the mother’s parental rights denies her “physical custody, as well as the rights ever to visit, communicate with, or regain custody of the child” (Santosky v Kramer, 455 US 745, 749 [1982]). Under these circumstances, any modification of the order dismissing the putative father’s petition for an order of filiation would have no practical effect on the mother’s rights. Accordingly, her appeal from that order must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Stephen Daniel A. [Sandra M.], 122 AD3d 836 [2014]; Matter of Ernest Y. v Orange County Dept. of Social Servs., 9 AD3d 411 [2004]).

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Santosky v. Kramer
455 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Matter of Stephen Daniel A. (Sandra M.)
122 A.D.3d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Davina R.M.R.L. (Jennifer A.)
123 A.D.3d 1126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Ernest Y. v. Orange County Department of Social Services
9 A.D.3d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 A.D.3d 1128, 997 N.Y.S.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-kwame-m-v-jennifer-a-nyappdiv-2014.