Matter of Krupp v. New York State Div. of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Krupp v. New York State Div. of Human Rights

136 A.D.3d 641, 23 N.Y.S.3d 901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 2016

Docket2012-10515

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.3d 641 (Matter of Krupp v. New York State Div. of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Krupp v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 136 A.D.3d 641, 23 N.Y.S.3d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated January 23, 2012, which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer dated August 5, 2011, made after a hearing, dismissing the petitioner’s complaint against the respondent Hahn Engineering, alleging discriminatory practices relating to employment in violation of the Human Rights Law.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs to the respondent Hahn Engineering.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination of the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights dismissing her claims of gender discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment was supported by substantial evidence (see Lambert v Macy’s E., Inc., 84 AD3d 744, 745 [2011]; Matter of Eastport Assoc., Inc. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 71 AD3d 890, 891 [2010]; Thide v New York State Dept. of Transp., 27 AD3d 452, 454 [2006]).

Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated January 23, 2012, which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer dated August 5, 2011, made after a hearing, dismissing the petitioner’s complaint against the respondent Hahn Engineering, alleging discriminatory practices relating to employment in violation of the Human Rights Law.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs to the respondent Hahn Engineering.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination of the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights dismissing her claims of gender discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment was supported by substantial evidence (see Lambert v Macy’s E., Inc., 84 AD3d 744, 745 [2011]; Matter of Eastport Assoc., Inc. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 71 AD3d 890, 891 [2010]; Thide v New York State Dept. of Transp., 27 AD3d 452, 454 [2006]).

Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.3d 641, 23 N.Y.S.3d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-krupp-v-new-york-state-div-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack