Matter of Krichevsky v. Kusakabe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Krichevsky v. Kusakabe

2017 NY Slip Op 5225, 151 A.D.3d 1065, 54 N.Y.S.3d 594

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 2017

Docket2016-13160

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 5225 (Matter of Krichevsky v. Kusakabe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Krichevsky v. Kusakabe, 2017 NY Slip Op 5225, 151 A.D.3d 1065, 54 N.Y.S.3d 594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit any further proceedings against the petitioner in the Family Court, Rings County, and application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 506 [b]; 7804 [b]).

Leventhal, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit any further proceedings against the petitioner in the Family Court, Rings County, and application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 506 [b]; 7804 [b]).

Leventhal, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 5225, 151 A.D.3d 1065, 54 N.Y.S.3d 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-krichevsky-v-kusakabe-nyappdiv-2017.