MATTER OF KRAUSKOPF v. Perales

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF KRAUSKOPF v. Perales

543 N.E.2d 79, 74 N.Y.2d 730, 544 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 833

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 543 N.E.2d 79 (MATTER OF KRAUSKOPF v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF KRAUSKOPF v. Perales, 543 N.E.2d 79, 74 N.Y.2d 730, 544 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 833 (N.Y. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. .

We agree, for the reasons stated by Justice Ann T. Mikoll at the Appellate Division (139 AD2d 147), that the Department of Social Services did not violate procedural requirements in adopting a definition of "mental disability” for the purpose of reimbursement eligibility pursuant to Social Services Law § 368-a; and that the definition adopted by the Department of Social Services is neither irrational nor arbitrary.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI