Matter of Koenig v. . Britt

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Koenig v. . Britt

96 N.E. 1118, 203 N.Y. 549, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 846

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 1911·Published

Opinion

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term in substance affirmed, without costs. There are some errors, however, in the form of the Special Term order, for which reason it must he modified, and the order for this may he settled on two days’ notice before the chief judge of this court.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term in substance affirmed, without costs. There are some errors, however, in the form of the Special Term order, for which reason it must he modified, and the order for this may he settled on two days’ notice before the chief judge of this court.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.

Matter of Koenig v. . Britt, 96 N.E. 1118, 203 N.Y. 549, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 846 (N.Y. 1911).

Pincite

96 N.E. 1118 (Matter of Koenig v. . Britt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.