Matter of Kelsey

2017 NY Slip Op 1359, 148 A.D.3d 257, 46 N.Y.S.3d 904
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 22, 2017
Docket2016-09799
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1359 (Matter of Kelsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Kelsey, 2017 NY Slip Op 1359, 148 A.D.3d 257, 46 N.Y.S.3d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

*258 OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On May 12, 2016, the respondent was found guilty in the County Court, St. Lawrence County, after a jury trial, of the following crimes: (1) sexual abuse in the first degree, a class D felony, in violation of Penal Law § 130.65 (2); (2) attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law §§ 110.00 and 130.65 (2); (3) forcible touching, a class A misdemeanor, in violation of Penal Law § 130.52; and (4) endangering the welfare of a child, a class A misdemeanor, in violation of Penal Law § 260.10 (1) (two counts). The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District now moves to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) based upon his felony conviction. Although the respondent was duly served, he has neither opposed the instant motion, nor interposed any response thereto.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the motion to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law is granted, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), to reflect the respondent’s automatic disbarment as of May 12, 2016.

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Dillon, Balkin and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent, Michael N. Kelsey, admitted as Michael Norman Kelsey, is disbarred, effective May 12, 2016, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b); and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Michael N. Kelsey, admitted as Michael Norman Kelsey, shall comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred and suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Michael N. Kelsey, admitted as Michael Norman Kelsey, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public *259 authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and its is further,

Ordered that if the respondent, Michael N. Kelsey, admitted as Michael Norman Kelsey, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency, and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15 (f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelsey v. Lewin
N.D. New York, 2024
Kelsey v. Sherman
S.D. New York, 2023
Kelsey v. Duwe
S.D. New York, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 1359, 148 A.D.3d 257, 46 N.Y.S.3d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-kelsey-nyappdiv-2017.