Matter of Keenan S. (Keith S.)

2020 NY Slip Op 1019
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 2020
Docket11021 NN2117/18 NN2118/18
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 1019 (Matter of Keenan S. (Keith S.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Keenan S. (Keith S.), 2020 NY Slip Op 1019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Matter of Keenan S. (Keith S.) (2020 NY Slip Op 01019)
Matter of Keenan S. (Keith S.)
2020 NY Slip Op 01019
Decided on February 13, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 13, 2020
Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

11021 NN2117/18 NN2118/18

[*1] In re Keenan S., and Another, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Keith S., Respondent-Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.


The Law Offices of Salihah R. Denman, PLLC, Harrison (Salihah R. Denman of counsel), for appellant.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kate Fletcher of counsel), for respondent.

Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane Pazar of counsel), attorney for the children.



Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Sarah P. Cooper, J.), entered on or about October 12, 2018, which, inter alia, after a hearing, found that respondent father neglected the subject child Keenan S., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [f][i][B]; 1046[b][i]). The record shows that the child was subject to actual or imminent danger of impairment to his emotional and mental condition due to his exposure to incidents of domestic violence by the father against the mother (see Matter of Andru G. [Jasmine C.], 156 AD3d 456 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Serenity H. [Tasha S.], 132 AD3d 508 [1st Dept 2015]). There exists no basis to disturb the court's credibility determinations (see Matter of Irene O., 38 NY2d 776, 777 [1975]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 13, 2020

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of O.
38 N.Y.2d 776 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Matter of Serenity H.
132 A.D.3d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Andru G. (Jasmine C.)
2017 NY Slip Op 8629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-keenan-s-keith-s-nyappdiv-2020.