Matter of Karnazes

133 A.D.3d 1027, 18 N.Y.S.3d 898
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 12, 2015
DocketD-78-15
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 A.D.3d 1027 (Matter of Karnazes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Karnazes, 133 A.D.3d 1027, 18 N.Y.S.3d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Elizabeth Marie Barnson Karnazes was admitted to practice by this Court in 1981. Karnazes was subsequently admitted in California in 1985, where she most recently maintained an office for the practice of law.

By order dated May 14, 2014, the Supreme Court of California disbarred Karnazes upon the recommendation of the State Bar Court of California (Matter of Karnazes, 2014 WL 232500, 2014 Calif Op LEXIS 2 [Cal Bar Ct 2014]). By order entered May 7, 2015, this Court disbarred Karnazes as a result of the discipline imposed in California (128 AD3d 1169 [2015]). * Karnazes now moves for, among other relief, reconsideration of this Court’s order of disbarment. The Committee on Professional Standards opposes the motion.

Upon review of the papers filed in support of the motion, we conclude that Karnazes has failed to present any newly discovered evidence or to demonstrate that this Court “overlooked or misapprehended the relevant facts, or misapplied *1028 any controlling principle of law” (Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567 [1979]; see CPLR 2221 [d] [2]; [e] [2]; Adderley v State of New York, 35 AD3d 1043, 1043-1044 [2006]). Nor has Karnazes demonstrated an entitlement to any other requested relief, including her request for a stay of this Court’s disbarment order. Accordingly, her motion is denied in all respects.

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur. Ordered that the motion of Elizabeth Marie Barnson Karnazes is denied.

*

It is noted that this Court has previously censured Karnazes (76 AD3d 1138 [2010]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Harriott v. Annucci
2019 NY Slip Op 1691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Valiando v. Catalfamo
138 A.D.3d 1271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D.3d 1027, 18 N.Y.S.3d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-karnazes-nyappdiv-2015.