Matter of Karim v. Raju
This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 02461 (Matter of Karim v. Raju) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Karim v Raju |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 02461 |
| Decided on April 22, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: April 22, 2021
Before: Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Singh, Moulton, JJ.
Index No. 100720/14 Appeal No. 13657 Case No. 2020-03078
v
Ramanathan Raju, M.D., et al., Respondents-Respondents.
Eisenberg & Schnell LLP, New York (Herbert Eisenberg and Julian R. Birnbaum of counsel), for appellant.
Garfunkel Wild, P.C., Great Neck (Leonard Rosenberg of counsel), for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Borrok, J.), entered January 21, 2020, which, inter alia, granted defendants' cross motion for sanctions, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the cross motion denied.
Plaintiff's motion, while ultimately unsuccessful, was not frivolous and therefore did not warrant sanctions (22 NYCRR § 130- 1.1[c][1], [2]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: April 22, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 NY Slip Op 02461, 143 N.Y.S.3d 182, 193 A.D.3d 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-karim-v-raju-nyappdiv-2021.