Matter of Kaplan (Greenman)

63 N.E.2d 337, 294 N.Y. 584, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 757
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 1945·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Appellate Division proceeded upon the assumption, without deciding, that a designating petition may be authenticated as to signatures by a subscribing witness who subscribes to the oath prescribed in section 135 of the Election Law, provided the witness has acted upon information affording him reasonable knowledge as to the identity of the signers. We are satisfied that the subscribing witness may lawfully act upon such information but the finding of the Appellate Division that the witness in this case did not in fact have such information and knowledge is beyond our power of review.

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Medalie, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Kaplan (Greenman), 63 N.E.2d 337, 294 N.Y. 584, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 757 (N.Y. 1945).

63 N.E.2d 337 (Matter of Kaplan (Greenman)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Molinari v. Powers
82 F. Supp. 2d 57 (E.D. New York, 2000)
Resnick v. Power
32 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Schaller v. McNab
212 N.E.2d 776 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Bata v. Bata
115 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)
Stephens v. Heffernan
186 Misc. 275 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)