Matter of Kal-El C. (Carla T.)

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 2026
Docket2024-07763
StatusPublished

This text of Matter of Kal-El C. (Carla T.) (Matter of Kal-El C. (Carla T.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Kal-El C. (Carla T.), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Matter of Kal-El C. (Carla T.) - 2026 NY Slip Op 03960
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Matter of Kal-El C. (Carla T.)

2026 NY Slip Op 03960

June 24, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of Kal-El C. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent; Carla T. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on June 24, 2026

2024-07763, (Docket No. N-1641-23)

Mark C. Dillon, J.P.

Valerie Brathwaite Nelson

Laurence L. Love

James P. McCormack, JJ.

Daniel L. Pagano, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

John M. Nonna, County Attorney, White Plains, NY (Jason S. Whitehead of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Andrew W. Szczesniak, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.

[*1]

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Rachel Hahn, J.), dated July 16, 2024. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the mother neglected the subject child.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, alleging, inter alia, that the mother neglected the subject child by, among other things, failing to provide the child with an adequate education. Following a fact-finding hearing, in an order dated July 16, 2024, the Family Court, inter alia, found that the mother neglected the child. The mother appeals.

Educational neglect is established when the petitioner proves by a preponderance of the evidence that a child's "physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired" due to the parent's failure to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child with an adequate education (Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][A]; see § 1046[b][i]). "Proof of a child's excessive absences is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of educational neglect" (Matter of Nevetia M. [Tiara M.], 184 AD3d 836, 837-838; see Matter of Joyitha M. [Reshmi M.], 121 AD3d 900, 901; Matter of Khalil M. [Ebony A.], 94 AD3d 1003, 1003).

Contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court's finding of educational neglect was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012[f][i][A]; 1046[b][i]). Here, the petitioner established a prima facie case of educational neglect by providing proof of the child's excessive absences during the 2022-2023 school year (see Matter of Nevetia M. [Tiara M.], [*2]184 AD3d at 838; Matter of Joyitha M. [Reshmi M.], 121 AD3d at 901). As a result of the excessive absences, the child was prevented from obtaining the services included in his individualized education program. The mother failed to provide a reasonable justification for the child's excessive absences (see Matter of Kieara N. [Shasha F.], 167 AD3d 620, 621-622).

The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.

DILLON, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, LOVE and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Joyitha M. (Reshmi M.)
121 A.D.3d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Nevetia M. (Tiara M.)
2020 NY Slip Op 3515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
In re Khalil M.
94 A.D.3d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Matter of Kal-El C. (Carla T.), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-kal-el-c-carla-t-nyappdiv-2026.