Matter of Julian John C. v. Edwin Gould Servs. for Children & Families

2017 NY Slip Op 268, 146 A.D.3d 565, 45 N.Y.S.3d 79
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 17, 2017
Docket2760
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 268 (Matter of Julian John C. v. Edwin Gould Servs. for Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Julian John C. v. Edwin Gould Servs. for Children & Families, 2017 NY Slip Op 268, 146 A.D.3d 565, 45 N.Y.S.3d 79 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), of the Family Court, Bronx County (Carol R. Sherman, J.), entered on or about June 26, 2015, insofar as it determined, after a hearing, that respondent mother permanently neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The agency demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that it made diligent efforts to assist respondent to reunite with the child, and that respondent rejected such assistance in that she failed to follow through on referrals for a mental health evaluation, drug treatment, drug testing, and parenting skills and failed to consistently attend agency-supervised weekly scheduled visits with the child (see Matter of Essence T.W. [Destinee R.W.], 139 AD3d 403, 404 [1st Dept 2016]; Matter of Jenna Nicole B. [Jennifer Nicole B.J, 118 AD3d 628, 629 [1st Dept 2014]; Matter ofJaylin Elia G. [Jessica Enid G.J, 115 AD3d 452, 452-453 [1st Dept 2014]). The mother failed to visit with the child for a period of almost six months (see Matter of Calvario Chase Norall W. [Denise W.], 85 AD3d 582, 583 [1st Dept 2011]; Matter of Aisha C., 58 AD3d 471, 472 [1st Dept 2009], Iv denied 12 NY3d 706 [2009]). She also failed to plan for the child’s future by failing to address the problems that led to the child’s removal (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Nevaeh Karen B. [Tamara B.], 134 AD3d 438, 439 [1st Dept 2015]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Nevaeh Karen B. (Tamara B.)
134 A.D.3d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Essence T.W. (Destinee R.W.)
139 A.D.3d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re Aisha C.
58 A.D.3d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Calvario Chase Norall W.
85 A.D.3d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 268, 146 A.D.3d 565, 45 N.Y.S.3d 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-julian-john-c-v-edwin-gould-servs-for-children-families-nyappdiv-2017.