Matter of Jordan v. White
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Matter of Jordan v White
2026 NY Slip Op 04305
July 8, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
In the Matter of Michael Edward Jordan, respondent,
v
Deleah White, appellant. (Proceeding No. 1)
In the Matter of Deleah White, appellant,
v
Michael Edward Jordan, respondent. (Proceeding No. 2)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Decided on July 8, 2026
2025-07382, (Docket Nos. V-25709-15, V-19459-17)
Colleen D. Duffy, J.P.
Janice A. Taylor
Lourdes M. Ventura
Elena Goldberg Velazquez, JJ.
Liberty Aldrich, Brooklyn, NY (Rachel J. Stanton and Janet Neustaetter of counsel), attorney for the child.
Elliot Green, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.
Lewis S. Calderon, Jamaica, NY, for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Gregory L. Gliedman, J.), dated May 14, 2025. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, granted the father's petition for sole legal and physical custody of the parties' child, denied the mother's petition for sole legal and physical custody of the child, and awarded certain parental access to the mother.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The parties, who were never married, have one child together, born in 2009. In 2015, the father filed a petition seeking sole legal and physical custody of the child. In 2017, the mother filed a petition seeking sole legal and physical custody of the child. Following a hearing, in an order dated May 14, 2025, the Family Court, among other things, granted the father's petition for sole legal and physical custody of the child, denied the mother's petition, and awarded certain parental access to the mother. The mother appeals.
A court deciding an initial petition for child custody must determine what is in the child's best interests (see Matter of Zacharie v Pennicott, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2026 NY Slip Op 03173, *2; Matter of Cortes v Bryant, 216 AD3d 773, 774). Factors to be considered in determining the child's best interests include the quality of the home environment and the parental guidance the custodial parent provides for the child, the ability of each parent to provide for the child's emotional and intellectual development, the financial status and ability of each parent to provide for the child, the relative fitness of the respective parents, and the effect an award of custody to one parent might have on the child's relationship with the other parent (see Matter of Zacharie v Pennicott, ___ AD3d [*2]at ___, 2026 NY Slip Op 03173, *2; Matter of Cortes v Bryant, 216 AD3d at 774). Since the Family Court's determination with respect to custody and parental access depends to a great extent upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and upon the character, temperament, and sincerity of the parties, its findings are generally accorded great deference and will not be disturbed unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Zacharie v Pennicott, ___ AD3d at ___, 2026 NY Slip Op 03173, *2; Matter of Mackey v Reaves, 246 AD3d 808, 809).
Here, contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court's determination that it was in the best interests of the child for the father to be awarded sole legal and physical custody of the child has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Zacharie v Pennicott, ___ AD3d at ___, 2026 NY Slip Op 03173, *2).
The mother's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.
DUFFY, J.P., TAYLOR, VENTURA and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Jordan v. White (Matter of Jordan v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.