Matter of Joo Yeon Leenoh

184 N.Y.S.3d 652, 2023 NY Slip Op 01727
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 30, 2023·No. PM-73-23·Published

Opinion

Matter of Joo Yeon Leenoh (2023 NY Slip Op 01727)
Matter of Joo Yeon Leenoh
2023 NY Slip Op 01727
Decided on March 30, 2023
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:March 30, 2023

PM-73-23

[*1]In the Matter of Joo Yeon Leenoh, a Suspended Attorney. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Joo Yeon Leenoh, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5462577.)


Calendar Date:January 23, 2023
Before:

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Joo Yeon Leenoh, Auckland, New Zealand, respondent pro se.



Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1435 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to November 23, 2022 and the January 19, 2023 correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law §468-a [Mahoney], 179 AD3d 1352, 1353 [3d Dept 2020]) it is,

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Pritzker, Ceresia and McShan, JJ., concur.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Joo Yeon Leenoh, 184 N.Y.S.3d 652, 2023 NY Slip Op 01727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

184 N.Y.S.3d 652 (Matter of Joo Yeon Leenoh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 468
New York JUD § 468