MATTER OF JONES v. Jones
This text of 481 N.E.2d 241 (MATTER OF JONES v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Appellate Division’s determination that no compelling reason for change of the original custody arrangement had been shown more nearly comports with the weight of the evidence than does the contrary determination of the Family Judge. In this setting there is no abuse of discretion.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur; Judge Titone taking no part.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
481 N.E.2d 241, 65 N.Y.2d 649, 65 N.Y. 649, 491 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jones-v-jones-ny-1985.