Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF JONES v. Jones

MATTER OF JONES v. Jones

481 N.E.2d 241, 65 N.Y.2d 649, 65 N.Y. 649, 491 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14765
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 28, 1985·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division’s determination that no compelling reason for change of the original custody arrangement had been shown more nearly comports with the weight of the evidence than does the contrary determination of the Family Judge. In this setting there is no abuse of discretion.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur; Judge Titone taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF JONES v. Jones, 481 N.E.2d 241, 65 N.Y.2d 649, 65 N.Y. 649, 491 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14765 (N.Y. 1985).

481 N.E.2d 241 (MATTER OF JONES v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald C. O. v. Carolyn D. V. B.
224 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Voelker v. Keptner
156 A.D.2d 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Sotanski v. McNichols
155 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Murphy v. Murphy
145 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Grover v. Grover
144 A.D.2d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Porter v. Fryer
142 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Desmond v. Desmond
134 Misc. 2d 62 (NYC Family Court, 1986)
Sussman v. Sussman
115 A.D.2d 122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)