Matter of Jayden H. (Gregorio H.)

2017 NY Slip Op 74, 146 A.D.3d 444, 43 N.Y.S.3d 749
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 2017
Docket2642
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 74 (Matter of Jayden H. (Gregorio H.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Jayden H. (Gregorio H.), 2017 NY Slip Op 74, 146 A.D.3d 444, 43 N.Y.S.3d 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Linda Tally, J.), entered on or about December 9, 2015, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about December 9, 2015, which found that respondent father had neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that the father neglected the children by using the residence he occupied with the children as the base of his drug trafficking operations (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]). A special agent *445 with the Drug Enforcement Administration testified that he observed the father going into and out of the home numerous times during the day, after engaging in conversations with individuals in vehicles, and that a search of the residence disclosed a large quantity of cocaine, crack cocaine, oxycodone tablets, and cash. Family Court properly concluded that the father’s conduct placed the children at imminent risk of harm (see Matter of Jaylin E. [Jessica G.], 81 AD3d 451 [1st Dept 2011]; Matter of Taliya G. [Jeannie M.], 67 AD3d 546 [1st Dept 2009]).

The delay in the proceedings did not prejudice the father or violate his due process rights, and Family Court providently exercised its discretion in adjourning the proceedings (see Matter of Steven B., 6 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]). The father was not produced in court due to his incarceration and as a result of concerns about prejudicing the criminal case against him.

We have considered the father’s remaining arguments, including those involving the laboratory test results, and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Feinman and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Alexia KK. (Isaac KK.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 74, 146 A.D.3d 444, 43 N.Y.S.3d 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jayden-h-gregorio-h-nyappdiv-2017.