Matter of Jared S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Jared S.

133 A.D.3d 465, 18 N.Y.S.3d 861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 2015

Docket16122 16121

StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.D.3d 465 (Matter of Jared S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Jared S., 133 A.D.3d 465, 18 N.Y.S.3d 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about January 6, 2014, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him with the Close to Home program for a period of up to 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant’s arguments relating to the victim’s credibility and the issue of the date on which the incident occurred are substantially similar to arguments this Court rejected on a companion appeal (Matter of Christopher S., 129 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2015]), and there is no reason to reach a different result here. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Andrias and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about January 6, 2014, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him with the Close to Home program for a period of up to 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant’s arguments relating to the victim’s credibility and the issue of the date on which the incident occurred are substantially similar to arguments this Court rejected on a companion appeal (Matter of Christopher S., 129 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2015]), and there is no reason to reach a different result here. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Andrias and Moskowitz, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.3d 465, 18 N.Y.S.3d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jared-s-nyappdiv-2015.