Matter of Jaquan F. (Alexis F.)

120 A.D.3d 1113, 993 N.Y.S.2d 18, 2014 NY Slip Op 06260, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6218
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2014
Docket12978
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 120 A.D.3d 1113 (Matter of Jaquan F. (Alexis F.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Jaquan F. (Alexis F.), 120 A.D.3d 1113, 993 N.Y.S.2d 18, 2014 NY Slip Op 06260, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Carol R. Sherman, J.), entered on or about May 6, 2013, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent mother neglected the subject child, placed the child with petitioner agency until the next permanency hearing, and directed respondent to comply with certain conditions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*1114 A preponderance of the evidence supports the court’s finding that respondent neglected the special needs child by failing to properly supervise him and failing to attend numerous medical appointments. The court was within its discretion in crediting the testimony of petitioner’s medical expert (see Matter of Cerda, 114 AD2d 795, 795-796 [1st Dept 1985]).

A preponderance of the evidence also supports the court’s finding of neglect based on the child’s excessive absences from school. The record shows that between September 11, 2011 and February 7, 2012, the child missed 52 days of school. The court rejected respondent’s explanation that she missed numerous medical appointments for the child because of inclement weather and lateness, resulting in the child being unable to obtain a prescription for a new protective helmet that was required for him to attend school and causing his absence from school for more than two months until the new helmet was obtained, and there is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determination (see Matter of Aliyah B. [Denise J.], 87 AD3d 943 [1st Dept 2011]).

Concur — Friedman, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Vazquez v. New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs.
2025 NY Slip Op 05328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Gabrielle N.
2018 NY Slip Op 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Gabrielle N. (Jacqueline T.)
139 A.D.3d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Derick L. (Catherine W.)
135 A.D.3d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re Naqi T.
129 A.D.3d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A.D.3d 1113, 993 N.Y.S.2d 18, 2014 NY Slip Op 06260, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jaquan-f-alexis-f-nyappdiv-2014.