Matter of James v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision

127 A.D.3d 1537, 5 N.Y.S.3d 924
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 30, 2015
Docket519537
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 127 A.D.3d 1537 (Matter of James v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of James v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, 127 A.D.3d 1537, 5 N.Y.S.3d 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, violent conduct and creating a disturbance as a result of an altercation with another inmate. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged and that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

While a review of the hearing transcript demonstrates that the Hearing Officer was often ill-mannered and lacking in professional decorum, we nonetheless confirm. The misbehavior report, related documentation and testimony from the correction officer who investigated the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Fernandez v Fischer, 110 AD3d 1422, 1422 [2013]; Matter of Leslie v Fischer, 107 AD3d 1264, 1265 [2013]). Testimony from *1538 petitioner and other inmate witnesses that petitioner was not involved in the incident created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Fernandez v Fischer, 110 AD3d at 1423; Matter of Mitchell v Bezio, 69 AD3d 1281, 1281-1282 [2010]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of McClain v. Venettozzi
146 A.D.3d 1264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Ramirez v. Annucci
138 A.D.3d 1262 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Jones v. Venettozzi
137 A.D.3d 1398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Sandy v. Venettozzi
134 A.D.3d 1346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Ramos v. Venettozzi
131 A.D.3d 1309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.3d 1537, 5 N.Y.S.3d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-james-v-new-york-state-department-of-corrections-and-community-nyappdiv-2015.