Matter of Jagels v. Taylor

22 N.E.2d 872, 281 N.Y. 677, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1133

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matter of Jagels v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 280 N.Y. 766 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 3, 1939·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following:

*678 “ The appellant contended that it was engaged in interstate commerce and, therefore) that the City Sales Tax (Local LaW Nb. 20 —1934) and the acts amendatory thereof Were repugnant tb the provisions of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the appellant was engaged in intrastate Commerce and that said City Sales Tax, as applied to SUch commerce, is constitutional.” (See 280 N. Y. 766.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following:

*678 “ The appellant contended that it was engaged in interstate commerce and, therefore) that the City Sales Tax (Local LaW Nb. 20 —1934) and the acts amendatory thereof Were repugnant tb the provisions of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the appellant was engaged in intrastate Commerce and that said City Sales Tax, as applied to SUch commerce, is constitutional.” (See 280 N. Y. 766.)

Matter of Jagels v. Taylor, 22 N.E.2d 872, 281 N.Y. 677, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1133 (N.Y. 1939).

Pincite

22 N.E.2d 872 (Matter of Jagels v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Matter of Jagels v. Taylor

21 N.E.2d 526 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)

Opinion

Related