Matter of Jacob L. (Chasitiy P.)

121 A.D.3d 502, 994 N.Y.S.2d 122
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 14, 2014
Docket13218 13217
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 121 A.D.3d 502 (Matter of Jacob L. (Chasitiy P.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Jacob L. (Chasitiy P.), 121 A.D.3d 502, 994 N.Y.S.2d 122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark V Richardson, J.), entered on or about November 7, 2013, upon a fact-finding that appellant mother neglected the subject child, and order of fact-finding, same court and Judge, entered on or about October 2, 2013, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant had neglected the subject child by reason of her untreated mental condition and failure to provide adequate supervision and guardianship, which placed the child’s physical, mental, and emotional condition at imminent risk of becoming impaired (see Matter of Immanuel C.-S. [Debra C.], 104 AD3d 615 [1st Dept 2013]). The hospital records and the expert witnesses’ testimony indicate that the mother suffers from, among other things, psychosis, bipolar disorder and paranoia, as evidenced by her beliefs that she is a famous actress, and someone is hacking into her computer. The mother testified to multiple extended hospitalizations for mental illness, and the record demonstrated her lack of insight into her illness and repeated relapses due to her noncompliance with treatment and prescribed medication (see Matter of Naomi S. [Hadar S.], 87 AD3d 936 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 804 [2012]).

Eetitioner was not obligated to prove that the child suffered past or present harm, since the evidence demonstrated that he was at risk of harm based on demonstrable conduct by the mother (see Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v Denise J., 87 NY2d 73, 79 [1995]).

Concur — Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of S.F.B. (F.F.)
2026 NY Slip Op 01276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Matter of Yamailiz G. (Yamara R.)
2019 NY Slip Op 9365 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Tyzavier M. (Shanice M.)
2017 NY Slip Op 8439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Ruth Joanna O.O. (Melissa O.)
2017 NY Slip Op 1524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A.D.3d 502, 994 N.Y.S.2d 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jacob-l-chasitiy-p-nyappdiv-2014.