Matter of Jackson v. Fouyalle

204 A.D.3d 1003, 165 N.Y.S.3d 322, 2022 NY Slip Op 02794
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 27, 2022
DocketDocket No. V-6236-15/17B
StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.3d 1003 (Matter of Jackson v. Fouyalle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Jackson v. Fouyalle, 204 A.D.3d 1003, 165 N.Y.S.3d 322, 2022 NY Slip Op 02794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Matter of Jackson v Fouyalle (2022 NY Slip Op 02794)
Matter of Jackson v Fouyalle
2022 NY Slip Op 02794
Decided on April 27, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 27, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2021-05271
(Docket No. V-6236-15/17B)

[*1]In the Matter of Tamiko Africa Jackson, respondent,

v

Guy Fouyalle, appellant.


William A. Sheeckutz, East Meadow, NY, for appellant.

Debra Bloom, Plainview, NY, attorney for the child.



DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Robert LoPresti, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated June 30, 2021. The order granted the mother's motion for permission to renew the passport of the parties' child without the father's written consent.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Family Ct Act § 1112[a]; Matter of Shu Jiao Zhao v Wei Rong, 183 AD3d 898).

IANNACCI, J.P., RIVERA, CHAMBERS and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Thomas v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys.
2020 NY Slip Op 3016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.3d 1003, 165 N.Y.S.3d 322, 2022 NY Slip Op 02794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jackson-v-fouyalle-nyappdiv-2022.