Matter of Jackson v. Annucci

2019 NY Slip Op 2936
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 2019
Docket527058
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2936 (Matter of Jackson v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Jackson v. Annucci, 2019 NY Slip Op 2936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Matter of Jackson v Annucci (2019 NY Slip Op 02936)
Matter of Jackson v Annucci
2019 NY Slip Op 02936
Decided on April 18, 2019
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 18, 2019

527058

[*1]In the Matter of THOMAS JACKSON, Petitioner,

v

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date: March 15, 2019
Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ.

Thomas Jackson, Marcy, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record, and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ortiz v Venettozzi, 167 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2018]; Matter of Cunningham v Annucci, 166 AD3d 1198, 1198 [2018]).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jackson-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2019.