Matter of J. T. R. (Anonymous) (Levy)

134 A.D.3d 1101, 21 N.Y.S.3d 640
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 2015
Docket2015-07503
StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.3d 1101 (Matter of J. T. R. (Anonymous) (Levy)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of J. T. R. (Anonymous) (Levy), 134 A.D.3d 1101, 21 N.Y.S.3d 640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR *1102 2304 to quash a grand jury subpoena, the petitioner appeals from an order of the County Court, Putnam County (Zuckerman, J.), dated August 11, 2015, which denied the application.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner’s appeal from the order denying the application to quash the grand jury subpoena served by the respondent has been rendered academic. We take judicial notice of the information in the correspondence from counsel in connection with this appeal that the respondent has withdrawn the subject grand jury subpoena. Therefore, any determination by this Court will not affect the rights of the parties (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713-714 [1980]). Nor do the circumstances presented warrant addressing the issues raised under an exception to the mootness doctrine (see id. at 714-715). Hall, J.P., Austin, Roman and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.3d 1101, 21 N.Y.S.3d 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-j-t-r-anonymous-levy-nyappdiv-2015.