Matter of Islais Creek Reclamation District

California Supreme Court

Matter of Islais Creek Reclamation District

15 P.2d 743, 216 Cal. 785, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 647

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 28, 1932

DocketDocket No. S.F. 14261.

StatusPublished

This text of 15 P.2d 743 (Matter of Islais Creek Reclamation District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Islais Creek Reclamation District, 15 P.2d 743, 216 Cal. 785, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 647 (Cal. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an action brought to determine the validity of bonds issued by Islais Creek Reclamation District, in the sum of $1,620,152, the full amount of the assessment levied upon the property owners of said district, representing the cost of the proposed reclamation works. Defendant Whitley contends that the bonds are invalid for the following reasons: First, that the district was never validly organized; second, that the plans of the trustees are indefinite; third, that the proposed works are intended chiefly for harbor development and sewage disposal, and not for reclamation purposes; fourth, that the assessment levied upon his land is inequitable and confiscatory.

[1] These contentions were all made by said defendant and decided adversely to him in the companion case of Whitley v.Islais Creek Reclamation District, (S.F. No. 14000) ante, p. 599 [15 P.2d 742], this day decided. The views expressed in that opinion make unnecessary any further discussion of the issues.

The judgment is affirmed. *Page 786

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is an action brought to determine the validity of bonds issued by Islais Creek Reclamation District, in the sum of $1,620,152, the full amount of the assessment levied upon the property owners of said district, representing the cost of the proposed reclamation works. Defendant Whitley contends that the bonds are invalid for the following reasons: First, that the district was never validly organized; second, that the plans of the trustees are indefinite; third, that the proposed works are intended chiefly for harbor development and sewage disposal, and not for reclamation purposes; fourth, that the assessment levied upon his land is inequitable and confiscatory.

[1] These contentions were all made by said defendant and decided adversely to him in the companion case of Whitley v.Islais Creek Reclamation District, (S.F. No. 14000) ante, p. 599 [15 P.2d 742], this day decided. The views expressed in that opinion make unnecessary any further discussion of the issues.

The judgment is affirmed. *Page 786

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 P.2d 743, 216 Cal. 785, 1932 Cal. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-islais-creek-reclamation-district-cal-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack