Matter of Isernio v. Blue Star Jets, LLC

140 A.D.3d 480, 31 N.Y.S.3d 884
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2016
Docket1431N 651295/15
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 140 A.D.3d 480 (Matter of Isernio v. Blue Star Jets, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Isernio v. Blue Star Jets, LLC, 140 A.D.3d 480, 31 N.Y.S.3d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered on or about August 20, 2015, which denied the petition to confirm an arbitration award, and granted respondent’s cross motion to vacate the award, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted, and the cross motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Contrary to the motion court’s conclusion, the arbitrator’s award, which granted petitioner’s claim after evaluating the evidence and identifying the salient issues, was “final and definite” (CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]; Matter of Olidort v Pewzner, 125 AD3d 778, 779 [2d Dept 2015]). A final and definite award will not be vacated unless “it is violative of a strong public policy, or is totally irrational, or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on [the arbitrator’s] power” (Montanez v New York City Hous. Auth., 52 AD3d 338, 339 [1st Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see CPLR 7511). None of the grounds for vacating an award exists on this record.

In concluding that the arbitrator had failed to consider a contractual provision and by drawing its own factual and legal determinations, the motion court exceeded its statutory power of review (Azrielant v Azrielant, 301 AD2d 269, 275 [1st Dept *481 2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 509 [2003]; CPLR 7510, 7511). We have considered respondent’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Castiglione v. Morgan Stanley
2024 NY Slip Op 34475(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Scob, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 33282(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Sono RX, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 32875(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co.
2023 NY Slip Op 34547 (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2023)
Matter of Anderson v. AHS (At Home Solutions, LLC)
2021 NY Slip Op 06917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.3d 480, 31 N.Y.S.3d 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-isernio-v-blue-star-jets-llc-nyappdiv-2016.