Matter of IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jagsarran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jagsarran

140 A.D.3d 465, 31 N.Y.S.3d 876

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 2016

Docket1411N 650747/14

StatusPublished

This text of 140 A.D.3d 465 (Matter of IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jagsarran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jagsarran, 140 A.D.3d 465, 31 N.Y.S.3d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from oral ruling, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), rendered November 13, 2014, deemed an appeal from order (CPLR 5520 [c]), same court and J.H.O., entered October 14, 2015, which dismissed the petition to permanently stay arbitration, and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration, and so considered, said order unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, the petition granted, and the arbitration permanently stayed.

In view of respondent’s admissions contained in the police accident report and the medical records of his treatment, Supreme Court’s determination that respondent’s accident was a hit-and-run covered by petitioner’s policy is against the weight of the evidence.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from oral ruling, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), rendered November 13, 2014, deemed an appeal from order (CPLR 5520 [c]), same court and J.H.O., entered October 14, 2015, which dismissed the petition to permanently stay arbitration, and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration, and so considered, said order unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, the petition granted, and the arbitration permanently stayed.

In view of respondent’s admissions contained in the police accident report and the medical records of his treatment, Supreme Court’s determination that respondent’s accident was a hit-and-run covered by petitioner’s policy is against the weight of the evidence.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A.D.3d 465, 31 N.Y.S.3d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ids-prop-cas-ins-co-v-jagsarran-nyappdiv-2016.