Matter of Ida M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Ida M.

2019 NY Slip Op 2878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 2019

DocketIndex No. 800085/12

StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2878 (Matter of Ida M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Ida M., 2019 NY Slip Op 2878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Matter of Ida M. (2019 NY Slip Op 02878)

Matter of Ida M.

2019 NY Slip Op 02878

Decided on April 17, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 17, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

2018-10284
(Index No. 800085/12)

[*1]In the Matter of Ida M. (Anonymous). Gino M. (Anonymous), et al., petitioners-appellants; Cara Buonincontri, etc., respondent-respondent, et al., nonparty-respondents.

Leavitt & Kerson, Forest Hills, NY (Paul E. Kerson of counsel), for petitioners-appellants.

Cara Buonincontri, Staten Island, NY, respondent-respondent pro se.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Thomas P. Aliotta, J.), dated June 19, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the petitioners' motion pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.35 to remove Cara Buonincontri as guardian of the person and property of Ida M.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petitioners' motion pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.35 to remove Cara Buonincontri as guardian of the person and property of Ida M. The petitioners' conclusory allegations did not provide a basis for removal (see Matter of Solomon R. [Michael R.], 123 AD3d 934, 935; Matter of Carmen H. [Thomas H.—Grace H.], 90 AD3d 1049; Matter of Mary Alice C., 56 AD3d 467, 468).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI