Matter of Ian I. v. State of New York
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 06487 (Matter of Ian I. v. State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Ian I. v State of New York |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 06487 |
| Decided on December 20, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 20, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., CURRAN, OGDEN, NOWAK, AND DELCONTE, JJ.
878 CA 23-01788
v
STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
ELIZABETH S. FORTINO, DIRECTOR, MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, UTICA (DAVID A. EGHIGIAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Charles C. Merrell, J.), entered October 11, 2023, in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10. The order, inter alia, continued petitioner's confinement to a secure treatment facility.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order, entered after an annual review hearing pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 10.09 (d), determining that he is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement under section 10.03 (e) and directing that he continue to be confined to a secure treatment facility (see § 10.09 [h]). We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We write only to note that, "as evidenced by a reading of [the decision and] the order, [the court] did not consider" respondent's posthearing submission (Thermo Spas v Red Ball Spas & Baths , 199 AD2d 605, 606 [3d Dept 1993]).
Entered: December 20, 2024
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 06487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ian-i-v-state-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2024.