Matter of Huss v. Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany

2018 NY Slip Op 1999
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2018
Docket6055 450766/16
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1999 (Matter of Huss v. Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Huss v. Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany, 2018 NY Slip Op 1999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Huss v Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany (2018 NY Slip Op 01999)
Matter of Huss v Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany
2018 NY Slip Op 01999
Decided on March 22, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 22, 2018
Tom, J.P., Webber, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

6055 450766/16

[*1]In re Gregory Huss, Petitioner-Appellant,

v

The Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, Respondent-Respondent.


Jacob Laufer, P.C., New York (Jacob Laufer of counsel), for appellant.

White & Case LLP, New York (Isaac S. Glassman of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered April 28, 2017, dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of the arbiter, dated December 7, 2015, which affirmed respondent's decision suspending petitioner's Article 2 Fund benefits and demanding return of prior payments, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petition was properly dismissed because petitioner lacks standing to challenge the termination of his Holocaust reparations payments, as it was determined by the arbiter and affirmed by the Director of the German Ministry of Finance that he has no legal right to receive such payments (see Hammerstein v Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany , 2008 NY Slip Op 30935[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2008]; Revici v Conference of Jewish Material Claims Against Germany , 11 Misc 2d 354 [Sup Ct, NY County 1958]; Matter of Jewish Secondary Schools Movement v Conference of Jewish Material Claims Against Germany , 11 Misc 2d 358, 358-359 [Sup Ct, NY County 1958]; Sampson v Federal Republic of Germany , 250 F3d 1145, 1156 [7th Cir 2001]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 22, 2018

DEPUTY CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-huss-v-conference-on-jewish-material-claims-against-germany-nyappdiv-2018.