Matter of Hurst v. Bd. of Edu. for the Ithaca City Sch. Dist.

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Hurst v. Bd. of Edu. for the Ithaca City Sch. Dist.

702 N.E.2d 837, 92 N.Y.2d 914, 680 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3075

DecidedSeptember 17, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 702 N.E.2d 837 (Matter of Hurst v. Bd. of Edu. for the Ithaca City Sch. Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Hurst v. Bd. of Edu. for the Ithaca City Sch. Dist., 702 N.E.2d 837, 92 N.Y.2d 914, 680 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3075 (N.Y. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of the motion for a change of venue, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that such portion of the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of the motion for a change of venue, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of the motion for a change of venue, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that such portion of the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of the motion for a change of venue, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 N.E.2d 837, 92 N.Y.2d 914, 680 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hurst-v-bd-of-edu-for-the-ithaca-city-sch-dist-ny-1998.