Matter of Hunter

California Court of Appeal

Matter of Hunter

195 P. 79, 50 Cal. App. 803, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 157

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 7, 1920

DocketCrim. No. 545.

StatusPublished

This text of 195 P. 79 (Matter of Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Hunter, 195 P. 79, 50 Cal. App. 803, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 157 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

At the time of the hearing of the above-entitled matter it was stipulated by counsel for the respective parties herein that the decision rendered in the proceeding entitled, "In theMatter of the Application of Ruby Hunter for a Writ of HabeasCorpus, Crim. No. 544," ante, p. 285, [195 P. 76], should be decisive of the application in the proceeding herein; and, inasmuch as we find that the applications, and the points and contentions in relation thereto, are identical in both cases —

It is therefore ordered that upon the authority of the decision rendered in the proceeding entitled, "In the Matter ofthe Application of Ruby Hunter for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Crim. No. 544," ante, p. 285, [195 P. 76], the writ herein be discharged and the petitioner remanded.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred. *Page 804

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

At the time of the hearing of the above-entitled matter it was stipulated by counsel for the respective parties herein that the decision rendered in the proceeding entitled, "In theMatter of the Application of Ruby Hunter for a Writ of HabeasCorpus, Crim. No. 544," ante, p. 285, [195 P. 76], should be decisive of the application in the proceeding herein; and, inasmuch as we find that the applications, and the points and contentions in relation thereto, are identical in both cases —

It is therefore ordered that upon the authority of the decision rendered in the proceeding entitled, "In the Matter ofthe Application of Ruby Hunter for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Crim. No. 544," ante, p. 285, [195 P. 76], the writ herein be discharged and the petitioner remanded.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred. *Page 804

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 P. 79, 50 Cal. App. 803, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hunter-calctapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack