MATTER OF HOTALING v. Hurd
152 N.E.2d 526, 4 N.Y.2d 979
This text of 152 N.E.2d 526 (MATTER OF HOTALING v. Hurd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MATTER OF HOTALING v. Hurd, 152 N.E.2d 526, 4 N.Y.2d 979 (N.Y. 1958).
Opinion
In the Matter of Mae E. Hotaling, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v.
T. Norman Hurd, as Director of the Budget of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
John J. Kelly, Jr., and John T. De Graff for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Milton Alpert and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondents.
Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'Neill v. Pfau
31 Misc. 3d 184 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
152 N.E.2d 526, 4 N.Y.2d 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hotaling-v-hurd-ny-1958.