Matter of Horowitz v. Kaplan
162 N.E. 519, 248 N.Y. 547, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1344
Opinion
Order of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the authority of Flannery v. Sahagian (134 N. Y. 85) and Hinkle v. Zimmerman (184 N. Y. 114).
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Horowitz v. Kaplan, 162 N.E. 519, 248 N.Y. 547, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1344 (N.Y. 1928).
162 N.E. 519 (Matter of Horowitz v. Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jelenevsky v. Leonakis
234 A.D.2d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re the Arbitration between Fischer & Queens Telephone Secretary, Inc.
106 A.D.2d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
In re the Arbitration between Brill & Muller Brothers, Inc.
40 Misc. 2d 683 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
In re the Arbitration between Petroleum Cargo Carriers, Ltd. & Unitas, Inc.
31 Misc. 2d 222 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
In re the Arbitration between Dukraft Manufacturing Co. & Bear Mill Manufacturing Co.
22 Misc. 2d 1057 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Fred J. Brotherton, Inc. v. Kreielsheimer
83 A.2d 707 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1951)