Matter of Holiday v. Holiday
This text of 184 N.Y.S.3d 665 (Matter of Holiday v. Holiday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Holiday v Holiday |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 01625 |
| Decided on March 24, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 24, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.
247 CAF 21-01747
v
KENDRA L. HOLIDAY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AND DYLAN W. BUSH, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
SARK LAW, LLC, HORSEHEADS (SUJATA RAMAIAH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
MARY HOPE BENEDICT, BATH, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Philip J. Roche, J.), entered December 6, 2021 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded petitioner sole custody of the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, respondent father appeals from an order that, inter alia, awarded petitioner maternal grandmother sole custody of the subject child. The record establishes, however, that the father consented to the order and it is well settled that "no appeal lies from an order entered upon the parties' consent" (Matter of Heinsler v Sero, 177 AD3d 1316, 1317 [4th Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Tina G., 242 AD2d 980, 980 [4th Dept 1997]). Although the father contends for the first time on appeal that he did not voluntarily consent to the order with respect to the award of legal custody, we note that "the proper procedural vehicle for [him] to pursue that claim is a motion to vacate the order" (Matter of Maria J. [Peter J.], 129 AD3d 1660, 1661 [4th Dept 2015]; see generally Matter of Michelle F., 280 AD2d 969, 969 [4th Dept 2001]).
Entered: March 24, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 N.Y.S.3d 665, 2023 NY Slip Op 01625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-holiday-v-holiday-nyappdiv-2023.