Matter of Hines v. Hines

2018 NY Slip Op 1811
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 2018
Docket378 CAF 17-00264
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1811 (Matter of Hines v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Hines v. Hines, 2018 NY Slip Op 1811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Hines v Hines (2018 NY Slip Op 01811)
Matter of Hines v Hines
2018 NY Slip Op 01811
Decided on March 16, 2018
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 16, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

378 CAF 17-00264

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF JANET HINES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT,

v

JOSHUA HINES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

IN THE MATTER OF JOSHUA HINES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

v

JANET HINES, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)


PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.

TULLY RINCKEY, PLLC, SYRACUSE (CHRISTINE F. REDFIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

SCOTT A. OTIS, WATERTOWN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.



Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (James K. Eby, J.), entered December 29, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded respondent-petitioner sole legal and physical custody of the subject child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: March 16, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hines-v-hines-nyappdiv-2018.