Matter of Hill v. Samaritan Hospital

81 N.E.2d 79, 298 N.Y. 182, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 817
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 16, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 81 N.E.2d 79 (Matter of Hill v. Samaritan Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Hill v. Samaritan Hospital, 81 N.E.2d 79, 298 N.Y. 182, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 817 (N.Y. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The finding of the Workmen’s Compensation Board that the claimant became disabled on February 10, 1942, as a result of pulmonary tuberculosis, an occupational disease which was due to the nature of her employment and was contracted by her within twelve months previous to the date of her disablement is supported by the evidence. Such finding, when taken in connection with the finding that- she completed her training as an affiliate student nurse at the New York Hospital on May 1,1940, brings her claim against the appellant, New York Hospital, within the statutory limitation of time barring recovery of compensation benefits “ unless the disease is * ⅜ * contracted * ⅞ within the twelve months previous to the date of disablement ”. It is the contraction of the occupational disease rather than exposure that commences the running of the statutory time limit. After giving maximum effect to such limitation more than twelve months elapsed after claimant left the New York Hospital before it may be said she had contracted the disease. An award of compensation benefits for disability due to occupational disease under such circumstances is barred by *184 the statute (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 40; Matter of Crowley v. Yonkers Herald Pub. Co., 250 App. Div. 670, 275 N. Y. 571).

The order of the Appellate Division and the award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board should be modified in accordance with the opinion herein, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division to appellant New York Hospital, and the matter remitted to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion herein.

LoughraN, Ch. J., Lewis, DesmoNd, Thacher, Dye and h uld, JJ., concur; CoNWAy, J., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Seifer v. Kings Park State Hospital
24 A.D.2d 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Bird v. New York State Thruway Authority
8 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Claim of Cerame v. Midland Rochester Co.
276 A.D.2d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 N.E.2d 79, 298 N.Y. 182, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hill-v-samaritan-hospital-ny-1948.