Matter of Hibbert

137 A.D.3d 786, 25 N.Y.S.3d 893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 2, 2016
Docket2015-01478
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 137 A.D.3d 786 (Matter of Hibbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Hibbert, 137 A.D.3d 786, 25 N.Y.S.3d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In a contested probate proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Johnson, S.), dated September 30, 2014, which denied his motion, inter alia, for leave to extend his time to file a motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing objections and to admit to probate the decedent’s last will and testament.

*787 Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this contested probate proceeding, a pretrial order set a deadline for the filing of all pretrial motions. After the deadline for filing all pretrial motions had passed, the petitioner moved, inter alia, for leave to extend his time to file a motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing objections and to admit to probate the decedent’s last will and testament. The Surrogate’s Court denied the motion.

The petitioner failed to make a showing of good cause for the delay in making the motion, as the excuse proffered by the petitioner amounted to a perfunctory claim of law office failure (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648, 652 [2004]; Quinones v Joan & Sanford I. Weill Med. Coll. & (Graduate Sch. of Med. Sciences of Cornell Univ., 114 AD3d 472 [2014]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion was properly denied.

Balkin, J.P., Hall, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lanza v. M-A-C Home Design & Constr. Corp.
2020 NY Slip Op 06512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
G4 Noteholder, LLC v. LDC Properties, LLC
2017 NY Slip Op 6524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Hennessey-Diaz v. City of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 25 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A.D.3d 786, 25 N.Y.S.3d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hibbert-nyappdiv-2016.