Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF HERMAN v. Blum

MATTER OF HERMAN v. Blum

425 N.E.2d 898, 54 N.Y.2d 677, 442 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2624
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 30, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 425 N.E.2d 898 (MATTER OF HERMAN v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF HERMAN v. Blum, 425 N.E.2d 898, 54 N.Y.2d 677, 442 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2624 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed, without costs. There is substantial evidence to support the commissioner’s determination that petitioner’s failure to accept his work referral was without good cause (see Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358). The asserted evidentiary errors have not been preserved for judicial review because of the absence of a specific objection or request for an adjournment to remedy the asserted defects (Matter of Sowa v Looney, 23 NY2d 329, 333; Matter of Leogrande v State Liq. Auth., 19 NY2d 418, 423).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirk v. Hammock
119 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Celestial Food Corp. of Coram, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
99 A.D.2d 25 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Bradford v. Blum
91 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
McKeon v. Brezenoff
89 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
425 N.E.2d 898, 54 N.Y.2d 677, 442 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-herman-v-blum-ny-1981.