Matter of Henning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Henning

132 A.D.3d 872, 17 N.Y.S.3d 891

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 2015

Docket2004-06838 ON MOTION

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.3d 872 (Matter of Henning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Henning, 132 A.D.3d 872, 17 N.Y.S.3d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by Mary K. Henning for reinstatement to the bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Ms. Henning was admitted to the bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 13, 1988. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 15, 2005, Ms. Henning was immediately suspended from the practice of law as a result of her conviction of a serious crime, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f), the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against her, and the issues raised were referred to the Honorable William D. Friedmann, as Special Referee to hear and report. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 8, 2005, the Honorable William D. Friedmann was relieved as Special Referee, and the matter was re-assigned to Norman B. Lichtenstein, Esq., as Special Referee, to hear and report. By opinion and order of this Court dated July 25, 2006, Ms. Henning was disbarred based on three charges of professional misconduct (see Matter of Henning, 32 AD3d 161 [2006]). By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 13, 2014, Ms. Henning’s motion for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on her current character and general fitness to practice law.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and the exhibits annexed thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that, effective immediately, Mary K. Henning is *873 reinstated as an attorney and.counselor-at-law, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Mary K. Henning to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Dillon, Balkin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by Mary K. Henning for reinstatement to the bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Ms. Henning was admitted to the bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 13, 1988. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 15, 2005, Ms. Henning was immediately suspended from the practice of law as a result of her conviction of a serious crime, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f), the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against her, and the issues raised were referred to the Honorable William D. Friedmann, as Special Referee to hear and report. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 8, 2005, the Honorable William D. Friedmann was relieved as Special Referee, and the matter was re-assigned to Norman B. Lichtenstein, Esq., as Special Referee, to hear and report. By opinion and order of this Court dated July 25, 2006, Ms. Henning was disbarred based on three charges of professional misconduct (see Matter of Henning, 32 AD3d 161 [2006]). By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 13, 2014, Ms. Henning’s motion for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on her current character and general fitness to practice law.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and the exhibits annexed thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that, effective immediately, Mary K. Henning is *873 reinstated as an attorney and.counselor-at-law, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Mary K. Henning to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Dillon, Balkin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.3d 872, 17 N.Y.S.3d 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-henning-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack