Matter of Heimsoth

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Heimsoth

175 N.E. 112, 255 N.Y. 409, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 694

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 175 N.E. 112 (Matter of Heimsoth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Heimsoth, 175 N.E. 112, 255 N.Y. 409, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 694 (N.Y. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We hold that in the circumstances of this case the appellant was under an active duty to see to it that the pendency of the separation suit be brought *411 to the notice of the court upon the inquest for default of an answer in the action for annulment.

The order should be affirmed. ■

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI