MATTER OF HAYMAN-CHAFFEY v. Landy

729 N.E.2d 1150, 94 N.Y.2d 932, 708 N.Y.S.2d 351, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 601
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 2000·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the Surrogate’s Court order denying the motion to renew and reargue, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF HAYMAN-CHAFFEY v. Landy, 729 N.E.2d 1150, 94 N.Y.2d 932, 708 N.Y.S.2d 351, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 601 (N.Y. 2000).

729 N.E.2d 1150 (MATTER OF HAYMAN-CHAFFEY v. Landy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.