MATTER OF HAWTHORNE v. Peartrees, Inc.
This text of 371 N.E.2d 827 (MATTER OF HAWTHORNE v. Peartrees, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of David L. Hawthorne, as Administrator of The Estate of Frederick Hawthorne, Deceased, Respondent,
v.
Peartrees, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Philip J. Caputo for Peartrees, Inc., and another, appellants.
William F. Fischer, Jr., and Martin Krutzel for O'Keefe Auto Service Corporation and another, appellants.
David Hirschhorn for David L. Hawthorne, respondent.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Morris N. Lissauer, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (56 AD2d 961).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
371 N.E.2d 827, 43 N.Y.2d 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hawthorne-v-peartrees-inc-ny-1977.