Matter of Hawkins v. Raynor
This text of 35 N.E.2d 926 (Matter of Hawkins v. Raynor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway. and Desmond, JJ.; Lehman, Ch. J., dissents on the ground that the undisputed evidence establishes that at the time of the accident the claimant was engaged in repairing a small boat in waters which, as matter of law, are navigable, and that, therefore, the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of New York has no application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 N.E.2d 926, 286 N.Y. 575, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hawkins-v-raynor-ny-1941.