Matter of Harrison v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Harrison v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal

922 N.E.2d 876, 13 N.Y.3d 900, 895 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2009 NY Slip Op 91575, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4545

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 17, 2009

DocketMotion No: 2009-1169

StatusPublished

This text of 922 N.E.2d 876 (Matter of Harrison v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Harrison v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, 922 N.E.2d 876, 13 N.Y.3d 900, 895 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2009 NY Slip Op 91575, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4545 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*901 Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing the proceeding, dismissed upon the ground that as to such order appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (2); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from Appellate Division orders denying, respectively, appellant’s motion for reconsideration or a rehearing and appellant’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such orders do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*901 Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing the proceeding, dismissed upon the ground that as to such order appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (2); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from Appellate Division orders denying, respectively, appellant’s motion for reconsideration or a rehearing and appellant’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such orders do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 N.E.2d 876, 13 N.Y.3d 900, 895 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2009 NY Slip Op 91575, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 4545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-harrison-v-new-york-state-division-of-housing-and-community-ny-2009.