Matter of Harding

25 N.C. 320
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1843
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 N.C. 320 (Matter of Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Harding, 25 N.C. 320 (N.C. 1843).

Opinion

Daniel, J.

Cooper, in his petition to the Comity Court of Northampton, states, that he has a lien, by virtue of his execution from Nash, on Tisdale’s share of the slaves, that were ordered to be sold by the said court, as is stated in the case; and that the court should now order so much of the proceeds of the said sale, as belonged to Tisdale, to be applied to the satisfaction of his lien. Cooper, however, was no party to the petition for the sale of slaves for a division¡ nor was he a purchaser of them under the order of sale.— He had no title either in law or equity, but by force of his claim of lien under his execution against Tisdale. Whether his claim of lien be good or not, we do not pretend to decide. But it seems to us he is such a stranger to the original petition and order of the court, under which the slaves were sold, that he cannot now be permitted to intervene in the way he is attempting. We are unable to find any authority to support his claim in this manner. We therefore think that the judgment must be reversed.

Per Curiam. Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washburn v. Washburn
67 S.E.2d 264 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Jordan v. . Faulkner
84 S.E. 764 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 N.C. 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-harding-nc-1843.