Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC v. Village of Mamaroneck

2020 NY Slip Op 2063
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 2020
DocketIndex No. 2371/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 2063 (Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC v. Village of Mamaroneck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC v. Village of Mamaroneck, 2020 NY Slip Op 2063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC v Village of Mamaroneck (2020 NY Slip Op 02063)
Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC v Village of Mamaroneck
2020 NY Slip Op 02063
Decided on March 25, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 25, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

2018-12794
(Index No. 2371/14)

[*1]In the Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC, et al., respondents,

v

Village of Mamaroneck, et al., appellants.


Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, White Plains, NY (Robert A. Spolzino of counsel), for appellants.

Zarin & Steinmetz, White Plains, NY (David J. Cooper of counsel), for respondents.



DECISION & ORDER

In a hybrid action, inter alia, for declaratory relief and proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, the defendants/respondents appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Linda S. Jamieson, J.), dated September 11, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of the plaintiffs/petitioners pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel the depositions of certain witnesses, and denied the cross motion of the defendants/respondents Village of Mamaroneck and Village of Mamaroneck Board of Trustees pursuant to CPLR 3103 for a protective order precluding those depositions.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In light of our determination on a related appeal (see Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC v Village of Mamaroneck [Appellate Division Docket No. 2017-05104; decided herewith]), this appeal has been rendered academic (see Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 772, 773).

AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v. New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 6243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 2063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hampshire-recreation-llc-v-village-of-mamaroneck-nyappdiv-2020.