MATTER OF HAMMERL v. Maevis
This text of 310 N.E.2d 542 (MATTER OF HAMMERL v. Maevis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to petitioner-respondent, on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler and Stevens. Judges Jones and Rabin dissent and vote to reverse and reinstate the determination of the Commissioner on the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Louis J. Capozzoli at the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 N.E.2d 542, 34 N.Y.2d 579, 354 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-hammerl-v-maevis-ny-1974.