Matter of Hamilton v. Village of Lynbrook
29 N.E.2d 931, 284 N.Y. 613, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1258
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. Advance payment, even after two years, constitutes a waiver of the bar of the statute. No opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Hamilton v. Village of Lynbrook, 29 N.E.2d 931, 284 N.Y. 613, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1258 (N.Y. 1940).
29 N.E.2d 931 (Matter of Hamilton v. Village of Lynbrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schneider v. Dunkirk Ice Cream
301 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Claim of Homan v. Gotham Building Maintenance Corp.
119 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Claim of Zumbo v. Scarsdale Bus Corp.
43 A.D.2d 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Claim of Maloney v. Sperry Gyroscope Co.
9 A.D.2d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Claim of Brooks v. Semet Solvay Division
9 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Claim of Campana v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
267 A.D. 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)